Prediction of Jim Grabb vs Leo Palin Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Grabb vs L. Palin

Jim Grabb

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'4" (193 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Leo Palin

FIN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'4" (193 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Grabb 1 - 0 Palin

They have played 2 sets in total, with Jim Grabb winning 2 and Leo Palin winning 0. The last match between Jim Grabb and Leo Palin was at the New Haven CH, 11-08-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Jim Grabb getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Grabb	1
Palin	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) New Haven CH(08-11-86)

Stats

Jim Grabb

Leo Palin

J. Grabb vs L. Palin H2H Profile

J. Grabb	Stats	L. Palin
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
47.83% (187-204)	Career Total W/L	47.25% (103-115)
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Grabb vs L. Palin Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jim Grabb has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Leo Palin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jim Grabb, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Leo Palin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jim Grabb has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leo Palin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jim Grabb has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Leo Palin winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jim Grabb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 123/112), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 19% (W/L 3/13). Leo Palin has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 52% (W/L 8/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 34/43).
Player level: In the last year, Jim Grabb has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Leo Palin has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jim Grabb winning 1 times and Leo Palin being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jim Grabb winning 2 and Leo Palin winning 0.
The last match between Jim Grabb and Leo Palin was at the New Haven CH, 11-08-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Jim Grabb getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jim Grabb has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Leo Palin has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jim Grabb has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leo Palin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jim Grabb has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leo Palin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jim Grabb vs Leo Palin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Grabb vs L. Palin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Grabb	Stats	L. Palin
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Grabb Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Legg Mason Tennis Classic - Washington D.C. - 14-07-1997
R1 Luis-Enrique HerreraL. Herrera	L	1-6 6-1 7-5	Stats
Gerry Weber Open - Halle - 09-06-1997
R1 Nicolas KieferN. Kiefer	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Japan Open - Tokyo - 14-04-1997
R1 Jean-Philippe FleurianJ. Fleurian	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Salem Open - Hong Kong - 07-04-1997
R1 Michael JoyceM. Joyce	W	3-6 6-3 7-5	Stats
R2 Thomas JohanssonT. Johansson	L	6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

L. Palin Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
New Haven CH - 11-08-1986
R3 Jim GrabbJ. Grabb	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tampere CH - 02-06-1986
R3 Hector OrtizH. Ortiz	W	3-6 6-3 7-5	Stats
R4 Javier FranaJ. Frana	L	6-3 3-6 6-0	Stats
Davis Cup EUR R1: POL vs FIN - 23-05-1986
Robin Waldemar RogowskiW. Rogowski	L	6-2 4-6 6-2 6-1	Stats
Jerusalem CH - 07-04-1986
R3 Shlomo GlicksteinS. Glickstein	L	7-5 7-6	Stats

View All

J. Grabb vs L. Palin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Grabb	Stats	L. Palin
47.83% (187/204)	YTD Win/Loss	47.25% (103/115)
48.86% (491/514)	Sets Win/Loss	47.96% (270/293)
49.77% (4881/4926)	Games Win/Loss	49.39% (2643/2708)
52.34% (123/112)	Hard Win/Loss	47.06% (48/54)
18.75% (3/13)	Clay Win/Loss	44.16% (34/43)
46.36% (51/59)	Indoor Hard W/L	42.11% (8/11)
33.33% (10/20)	Grass Win/Loss	45.45% (5/6)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
216.71	Average Opponent Rank	618.22
44.23% (23/29)	Slam W/L	30.77% (4/9)
48.53% (33/35)	Masters W/L	25.00% (1/3)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	62.50% (15/9)
47.67% (123/135)	Main Tour W/L	32.39% (23/48)
61.54% (8/5)	Challenger W/L	56.60% (60/46)
48% (156/327)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	46% (83/181)
50% (30/60)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	54% (20/37)
42% (37/88)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
45% (59/132)	Deciding Set Win %	49% (35/72)
83% (178/148)	1st Set Won, Won Match	76% (105/80)
17% (178/30)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	24% (105/25)
18% (213/39)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (113/22)